Revisiting American History – Financial Empire
More, http://www.youtube.com/user/councilonsper
People just need to come to the realization we are under occupation. None of the issues matter besides that one and it is a documented fact shown below. This video should have 300 million views.
Canadian Judge Bows to Sovereign Man
This video has been making the rounds in liberty circles these days.
Case Dismissed with Cause and Prejudice Judge bows to Sovereign
The man in the video, Keith, was called into court because he parked his own car on his own lawn – apparently some sort of crime in Canada. The judge seemed very adamant about getting Keith to identify himself as “Keith Thompson” and raised his voice a number of times. The judge even requests that Keith be removed from the courtroom. A few bailiffs appear on screen, seeming ready to honor the judges request, but Keith asks them to back away from him and they comply. Keith gets one of the bailiffs to take some paperwork, and shortly thereafter the judge takes a recess. Now for the most interesting part – just before he leaves the courtroom, the judge bows in the direction of Keith.
In America, bowing is generally seen as a very formal custom. There are very few places where we use it. Of course, every culture is different, so I wasn’t sure what the customs were for Canada. With very minimal research, I found the Wikipedia page on Canadian court customs. From that article I found, “In most jurisdictions, when entering or leaving a courtroom when there is a judge seated inside, one should bow, while standing inside the court but near the doorway, in the direction of the seated judge. Many lawyers also bow when crossing the bar.”
That implies that the general public should bow into and out of the courtroom if there is a judge present, but says nothing of what customs the judge should follow for respect. I have never seen a judge show respect for the people, but things may be different in Canada. Another interesting thing to note is that when the judge leaves, one woman bows back to him. (seen at 2:14) I’m assuming this woman is the clerk, and therefore on the side of the state – along with the judge. But if that is the case, it is curious that the bailiffs do not bow back to the judge.
I still had questions about this video, so I sent a message to Keith. I specifically wondered what was the paper he handed to the bailiff that appeared to send the judge off the bench. He informed me that was his birth certificate – what he believed the courts were really after. He also had documentation on him that showed his, “oath of office as a peace officer hired by the people, not the crown,” which he asserts is the reason the bailiffs would not touch him.
I have already heard many arguments that this video is based on so-called “liberty conspiracies” such as Capitis Diminutio Maxima and the Straw Man argument. I don’t have much knowledge on those subjects, but I can tell you what I love about this video. First of all, Keith stays very calm and clearly explains himself, even with the judge yelling at him and bailiffs surrounding him. He does not blindly submit to the court’s jurisdiction – he wears what he wants, stands where he wants, and does not show arbitrary respect for people who haven’t earned it. I believe he has earned some level of respect from the bailiffs in the video, or they would have hauled him out of there at the very first request of the judge. Having the bailiffs on your side is a great first step in being able to show the truth in the courts.
Hopefully Keith and his friends will continue to spread the message of liberty throughout Canada. We could always use more peace-minded neighbors.
ICLEI is a Conspiracy and That’s No Theory
ICLEI is a foreign organization on a mission to transform local governments. Each ICLEI mandate, policy and agenda is based on the principle that the collective good is more important than individual rights; this is in direct opposition to the principles set forth in the Declaration of Independence.
http://www.freedomadvocates.org/articles/illegitimate_government/iclei_is_a_conspiracy_and_that%27s_no_theory_20100820423/
Greenfield, Amherst, Northampton and more towns and cities are tyrannical ICLEI nightmares! Montague is getting grants and is social planning with similar results, are they next to go official ICLEI?
We know.
Alex Thomas
The Intel Hub
Today, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth presented key evidence at The National Press Club, evidence that indicated, without a shadow of doubt, that the official story is a complete lie.
In what can be described as a miracle, multiple mainstream or semi mainstream news agencies have reported the event, using PR Newswire as their source. These agencies include Yahoo, Forbes, The Sun Herald, and BreitBart.
The best kept Supreme Court secret, ever.
J.T.Coyoté
Infowars.com
September 10, 2010
In June of 1997 Sheriffs Jay Printz of Montana and Richard Mack of Arizona, properly embarrassed the federal government by winning a 5-4 Supreme Court decision finding key provisions of the Brady Law unconstitutional on 10th Amendment grounds. The 10th Amendment reads: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
FULL STORY http://www.infowars.com/the-best-kept-supreme-court-secret-ever/
Obstruction and Outreach in Springfield
Yesterday I traveled down to Springfield to continue coverage of the Montague building inspector incident in Millers Falls. After observing New Hampshire activists bring video cameras into the courthouse in Greenfield, I was not expecting any delays when I went in with my Notice to Film.
I started to expect a certain amount of bureaucracy when I looked up to see this quote on the lintel of one of the court buildings: “Obedience to Law is Liberty.”
I had to stop to take a picture, because I really couldn’t believe that they would be that blatant in their attack on freedom. Am I only free if I follow their laws? I think they might need to look up the definition of “liberty.” And maybe “obedience” while they’re at it.
In any case, after waiting over 30 minutes, my Notice to Film was denied. The clerk that “helped” me said it was because I was, “clearly not from the media.” He told me I could bring it up with the Judge on record once court started. Needless to say, I was quite irritated at that point. There was still time until court started though, so I decided to go for a walk with a friend who had come to observe.
We ended up at a little store that sold – among other things – knives. Talk with the man behind the counter eventually led to the legality of different types of knives. I was pleasantly surprised at how Libertarian-minded the man was. He brought up the point to me that Texas has such a low crime rate considering the size of the state and the amount of large cities in it. I noted that that could be due to the high percentage of the population that carry guns. He seemed quite receptive and open-minded.
Back at the courthouse though, I was faced with more bureaucracy. Now this may be due to my inexperience in the court system, but I could not get the judge to recognize me. If I were not worried about my actions negatively influencing the judge against Mrs. Golrick, I would have been more adamant in clarifying whether he was still denying my access. I did stay for the remainder of the court process though, even without my camera.
To his credit, Judge Fields put on a nice facade in seeming fair. The opposing party – The Town of Montague – tried to get an order to completely shut down the building. They wanted it boarded up, the utilities shut off, and everyone locked out. They claim to simply want all work to stop until the “proper permits” are obtained, so boarding up the building seemed to be quite excessive to me. Mrs. Golrick’s representation must have been thinking the same thing, because he objected to that process, saying it would give the town leeway to deem the property “abandoned.”
Again, my hopes were brought up when I heard the whisperings of some fellow court observers. “That’s what I was thinking,” is one quote I remember hearing. I’m glad to see that the fraud of the town is apparent even to outsiders. Whether they prefer to come to court to observe, or simply make a living doing what they love, people are waking up all around. The “officials” will be outed as the actors that they are. All the people need to do is stand up against the corruption en masse.The final court order is that the Judge make a visual inspection of the property on Friday morning, and then proceed to Housing Court in Greenfield after that.
